<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Cash for Clunkers&#8221; is a Lie and a Ripoff!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dr1665.com/2009/05/cash-for-clunkers-is-a-lie-and-a-ripoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dr1665.com/2009/05/cash-for-clunkers-is-a-lie-and-a-ripoff/</link>
	<description>gearhead philosopher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Driggs</title>
		<link>http://www.dr1665.com/2009/05/cash-for-clunkers-is-a-lie-and-a-ripoff/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Driggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dr1665.com/?p=323#comment-684</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve heard, the bulk of the participants in this program were likely already in the market for a new vehicle this summer, so it could just be that, instead of spreading those purchases out over the summer, this program is merely concentrating all those deals into a month&#039;s time.  We&#039;ll probably see another couple billion (atop the recent $2Bn expansion to this past week) before the end of August.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really think this sets a terrible precedent.  If the initial $1Bn budget didn&#039;t even last a week and the program was suspended, then I&#039;m thinking the additional $2Bn just approved might last two weeks, tops.  Then what?  Another couple billion?  Eventually, the auto industry is going to *have to* face the reality of a declining market.  Of course, there is always the chance that our government, in their infinite wisdom, will simply continue to subsidize the industry indefinitely on the taxpayers&#039; dime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#39;ve heard, the bulk of the participants in this program were likely already in the market for a new vehicle this summer, so it could just be that, instead of spreading those purchases out over the summer, this program is merely concentrating all those deals into a month&#39;s time.  We&#39;ll probably see another couple billion (atop the recent $2Bn expansion to this past week) before the end of August.</p>
<p>I really think this sets a terrible precedent.  If the initial $1Bn budget didn&#39;t even last a week and the program was suspended, then I&#39;m thinking the additional $2Bn just approved might last two weeks, tops.  Then what?  Another couple billion?  Eventually, the auto industry is going to *have to* face the reality of a declining market.  Of course, there is always the chance that our government, in their infinite wisdom, will simply continue to subsidize the industry indefinitely on the taxpayers&#39; dime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sayswho</title>
		<link>http://www.dr1665.com/2009/05/cash-for-clunkers-is-a-lie-and-a-ripoff/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>sayswho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dr1665.com/?p=323#comment-683</guid>
		<description>what I can&#039;t figure out is how are people affording a new car? I thought you had to have good credit, and I also thought the banks weren&#039;t loaning anyone money, and in this economy who would want to go in debt, something smells bad here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what I can&#39;t figure out is how are people affording a new car? I thought you had to have good credit, and I also thought the banks weren&#39;t loaning anyone money, and in this economy who would want to go in debt, something smells bad here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR1665</title>
		<link>http://www.dr1665.com/2009/05/cash-for-clunkers-is-a-lie-and-a-ripoff/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>DR1665</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dr1665.com/?p=323#comment-514</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve heard, the bulk of the participants in this program were likely already in the market for a new vehicle this summer, so it could just be that, instead of spreading those purchases out over the summer, this program is merely concentrating all those deals into a month&#039;s time.  We&#039;ll probably see another couple billion (atop the recent $2Bn expansion to this past week) before the end of August.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really think this sets a terrible precedent.  If the initial $1Bn budget didn&#039;t even last a week and the program was suspended, then I&#039;m thinking the additional $2Bn just approved might last two weeks, tops.  Then what?  Another couple billion?  Eventually, the auto industry is going to *have to* face the reality of a declining market.  Of course, there is always the chance that our government, in their infinite wisdom, will simply continue to subsidize the industry indefinitely on the taxpayers&#039; dime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#39;ve heard, the bulk of the participants in this program were likely already in the market for a new vehicle this summer, so it could just be that, instead of spreading those purchases out over the summer, this program is merely concentrating all those deals into a month&#39;s time.  We&#39;ll probably see another couple billion (atop the recent $2Bn expansion to this past week) before the end of August.</p>
<p>I really think this sets a terrible precedent.  If the initial $1Bn budget didn&#39;t even last a week and the program was suspended, then I&#39;m thinking the additional $2Bn just approved might last two weeks, tops.  Then what?  Another couple billion?  Eventually, the auto industry is going to *have to* face the reality of a declining market.  Of course, there is always the chance that our government, in their infinite wisdom, will simply continue to subsidize the industry indefinitely on the taxpayers&#39; dime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sayswho</title>
		<link>http://www.dr1665.com/2009/05/cash-for-clunkers-is-a-lie-and-a-ripoff/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>sayswho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 14:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dr1665.com/?p=323#comment-513</guid>
		<description>what I can&#039;t figure out is how are people affording a new car? I thought you had to have good credit, and I also thought the banks weren&#039;t loaning anyone money, and in this economy who would want to go in debt, something smells bad here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what I can&#39;t figure out is how are people affording a new car? I thought you had to have good credit, and I also thought the banks weren&#39;t loaning anyone money, and in this economy who would want to go in debt, something smells bad here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

