DR1665 Rotating Header Image

Obama Empowers California Smog Nazis

As I’m sneaking in this post this afternoon, there are almost 50,000 Google hits for “Obama allows CARB to set laws.” In no way do I aspire to be one of those sites that paraphrases the same news feeds as everyone else, but that doesn’t mean there won’t be posts like this, sharing my take on something in the news. There’s a lot of gear heads out there, like me, talking about this issue today.

I originally read the story on Jalopnik, (linked by @uberingram) and there’s certainly reason to be concerned if you’re a car guy. The California Air Research Board (CARB) is an uncompromising strong arm entity of the government of the People’s Republic of California (jokingly: PRC). They set standards above and beyond those of the rest of the country which often come across as asinine to those of us who actually work on our own vehicles. Their aim of having cleaner air is wonderful, but the way in which they enforce this aim, rather than encourage it, leaves a bad taste in the mouths of many a car enthusiast.

Not every car or truck owner out there necessarily believes in global warming, but the vast, vast majority of us agree that reduced emissions and more MPGs is a good thing. Clean air is something we can all believe in, but our fear is that CARB will soon enact programs which penalize the owners of older cars, leading to a dozen other states following, lock stepping without concern for those of us who responsibly modify our vehicles. These are some of our most prized possessions. What if they tell us they’ll no longer allow vehicles older than 1995 on the road? This is my fear.

Let the new cars to which we have no allegiance be forced to perform more economically for all I care. Just don’t get some crazy idea in your head that I’m going to give up or stop driving anything built the day before these new laws went into effect. This might sound ridiculous, and maybe it’s entirely unwarranted, but if CARB had its way, nobody in America would be driving anything that wasn’t a hybrid (despite hybrids being worse for the environment based on their manufacture).

CARB is an organization which neither understands nor appreciates your having passion for automobiles and they will walk over any and all of us if they get their way. For this reason, I am concerned, but until they start talking about restricting the registration of older vehicles, I’m not entirely worried.  Regardless, what is good for CARB is typically bad for car guys.

  • Given that the car manufacturers all need help right now and governments around the world are likely to give it to them I can see 'green' initiatives that will tax older cars off the road so we're more inclined to buy new ones.
    Ultimately, CO2 reduction is a great excuse to get us purchasing new...
  • Actually, there is a decent case for the CARB regulations.

    The primary aim is to, of course, help clean up the air in a smog-infested hell-hole. Granted, not ALL of California is LA, but LA pretty much IS California (I know I'll catch hell, but go with me here...). As a result, the CARB laws were created and passed, quite unanimously if I recall. Net effect: good for the immediate environment. At it's core, CARB regulations actually do good and mean well. Despite what the modifying community feels, the CARB board isn't out to convert everyone into driving the rough equivalent of a beige box. What they are out to do is encourage people to be more responsible with what they have.

    The problem comes in via law enforcement's approach to CARB. CARB is now a tool used to generate additional revenue in some (read: VERY few) police jurisdictions. So, of course, it gets reviled. The notion that something like CARB will suddenly be used across the nation and destroy car ownership/love as we know and understand it is unfounded. Enforcing it would be all-but-impossible and cost more than anyone would be willing to add their votes to in a budget committee. The idea here is to create a uniform, national standard that attempts to better everyone together. Given that several after-market manufacturers are able to get their parts CARB-approved shows that CARB actually does want you to love the hell out of your car, they just want you to at least hug the environment. Seriously, that's it.

    As far as "penalization" goes. This is a non-issue. If you buy a car that's INCREDIBLY cheap, it's not because the owner suddenly feels like being nice. They're getting rid of it because they themselves either can't afford the repairs, or don't want to invest the time/money into it. So that "great deal" is rarely anything but. Yes, you can blame the exorbitant cost of car repair on "shady" mechanics, but this just devolves into a strawman. Owning a car requires work and money. Period.

    I'm certainly not against car modification. On the contrary, I'm quite for it. And, much like your statement, I'm for responsible modification. Keeping a careful eye on how a modification will affect a car is a critical part of being responsible. You understand this as does CARB. So instead of using a small segment of the population (pissed off street-racers primarily), look at this as an opportunity to further the science (and art) of vehicle modification. Frankly, the idea of a national adoption of CARB standards actually makes me excited for what could come in the future.

    And remember. Torque isn't a right, it's a hard-won privilege.

    Oh you folks who are all "don't you mean 'horsepower' lolol!?" can kindly die. Thanks! :)

    /I keed. don't die. go comatose, I want to laugh at you for a while.
blog comments powered by Disqus